Historical Materialism 3 (1):3-28 (1998)

Abstract
Lenin's name has been coupled with that of Marx as the co-founder of the theory of ‘Marxism-Leninism'. However, despite his emphasis on the role of revolutionary theory, Lenin's original theoretical contributions to the development of Marxism were very limited. His talents were those of a determined revolutionary, in the populist tradition of Chernyshevsky, and a brilliantly effective propagandist and political organiser. His contribution to ‘Marxism-Leninism’ was to modify Marxist orthodoxy in such a way as to integrate the political and organisational principles of revolutionary populism into Marxism, on the basis of Plekhanov's ‘dialectical materialism', whose distinctive interpretation of Marxism was Lenin's constant guide and inspiration. In this paper I want to argue that Lenin never broke from the theoretical and political traditions of Russian populism, but completed Plekhanov's project by assimilating Marxism to the very different theoretical framework of populism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/156920698100414257
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rearticulating Contemporary Populism.Michael Bray - 2015 - Historical Materialism 23 (3):27-64.
On Joseph McCarney's Hegel on History.Tony Smith - 2001 - Historical Materialism 9 (1):217-225.
Quakes of Development.Michael Cowen - 2000 - Historical Materialism 6 (1):149-214.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total views
83 ( #143,157 of 2,533,753 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #163,628 of 2,533,753 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes