Values, circumstances, and epistemic justification

Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):373-391 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX


"Evidentialism" is the view that a person's epistemic justification for a doxastic attitude is determined entirely by his or her evidence for the content of that attitude. This paper has two goals. The first is to argue that values and circumstances properly influence epistemic justification, and that evidentialism is therefore untenable, even as an epistemic ideal. The second is to outline a nonevidentialist theory of epistemic justification that avoids the common objection that nonevidentialist theories fail to preserve important distinctions between epistemic justification, on the one hand, and moral and prudential justification, on the other hand



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

71 (#167,605)

6 months
1 (#416,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rosalind Simson
Mercer University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references