The Hierarchy of Fregean Senses

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (4):255-261 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question whether Frege’s theory of indirect reference enforces an infinite hierarchy of senses has been hotly debated in the secondary literature. Perhaps the most influential treatment of the issue is that of Burge (1979), who offers an argument for the hierarchy from rather minimal Fregean assumptions. I argue that this argument, endorsed by many, does not itself enforce an infinite hierarchy of senses. I conclude that whether or not the theory of indirect reference can avail itself of only finitely many senses is pending further theoretical development.

Similar books and articles

On Indirect Sense and Reference.Lukas Skiba - 2014 - Theoria 81 (1):48-81.
Informativeness and Multiple Senses.Genoveva Marti - 2014 - Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica. Special Issue on Frege’s Puzzle (136):27-32.
Sense and Evidence.Ian Rumfitt - 2013 - The Monist 96 (2):177-204.
Kripke's Fregean Argument Against Materialism.Paul Inman Coppock - 1982 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Fregean Senses.James Edward Zaiss - 1988 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine
The Composition of Thoughts.Richard Heck & Robert May - 2010 - Noûs 45 (1):126-166.
An Analysis of the W -Hierarchy.Yijia Chen, Jörg Flum & Martin Grohe - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (2):513 - 534.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-09

Downloads
223 (#86,342)

6 months
27 (#105,170)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ori Simchen
University of British Columbia