Semantic Singularities: Paradoxes of Reference, Predication, and Truth

Oxford, England: Oxford University Press (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book aims to provide a solution to the semantic paradoxes. It argues for a unified solution to the paradoxes generated by our concepts of denotation, predicate extension, and truth. The solution makes two main claims. The first is that our semantic expressions 'denotes', 'extension' and 'true' are context-sensitive. The second, inspired by a brief, tantalizing remark of Godel's, is that these expressions are significant everywhere except for certain singularities, in analogy with division by zero. A formal theory of singularities is presented and applied to a wide variety of versions of the definability paradoxes, Russell's paradox, and the Liar paradox. Keith Simmons argues that the singularity theory satisfies the following desiderata: it recognizes that the proper setting of the semantic paradoxes is natural language, not regimented formal languages; it minimizes any revision to our semantic concepts; it respects as far as possible Tarski's intuition that natural languages are universal; it responds adequately to the threat of revenge paradoxes; and it preserves classical logic and semantics. Simmons draws out the consequences of the singularity theory for deflationary views of our semantic concepts, and concludes that if we accept the singularity theory, we must reject deflationism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paradoxos Semânticos.Ricardo Santos - 2014 - Compêndio Em Linha de Problemas de Filosofia Analítica.
A Berry and A Russell Without Self-Reference.Keith Simmons - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (2):253-261.
Paradoxes of validity.Keith Simmons - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (2):383-403.
The truth-tellers paradox.Alexandre Billon - 2013 - Logique Et Analyse (204).
Definability and the Structure of Logical Paradoxes.Haixia Zhong - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):779 - 788.
A Unified Theory of Truth and Paradox.Lorenzo Rossi - 2019 - Review of Symbolic Logic 12 (2):209-254.
Paradoxes: A Study in Form and Predication.James Cargile - 1979 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Universality and the Liar: An Essay on Truth and the Diagonal Argument.Keith Simmons - 1993 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Denotation, Paradox and Multiple Meanings.Stephen Read - 2019 - In Can Başkent & Thomas Macaulay Ferguson (eds.), Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 439-454.
Yablo’s Paradox: Is the Infinite Liar Lying to Us?Andrei V. Nekhaev - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (3):88-102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-17

Downloads
12 (#1,062,297)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith Simmons
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

Truth and Gradability.Jared Henderson - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (4):755-779.
The Liar Without Relativism.Poppy Mankowitz - 2021 - Erkenntnis 88 (1):267-288.
Paradoxes of validity.Keith Simmons - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (2):383-403.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references