Jurisprudence 1 (2):277-293 (2010)

The essay replies to comments by Finnis, Gardner and Endicott, on my book, Law as a Moral Idea. It is questioned whether Finnis is right to suggest that governance by law is a requirement of justice. It is suggested that Hart's positivism may have rested upon an unduly private conception of morality. Gardner's suggestion that Law as a Moral Idea falsely manufactures disagreement with Hart is rejected, principally by pointing out that Gardner focuses upon only one issue, where the book already acknowledges that Hart might conceivably agree, and ignores other issues where the disagreement with Hart seems indisputable. In response to Endicott, it is acknowledged that 'politics' could be understood as a moral idea comparable to the idea of 'law', but denied that this robs either thesis of interest. The nature of doctrinal reasoning and law's justificatory force is then discussed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5235/204033210793524294
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,018
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Law as a Moral Idea.Nigel Simmonds - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Hart on Legality, Justice and Morality.John Gardner - 2010 - Jurisprudence 1 (2):253-265.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Fuller's Internal Morality of Law.Kristen Rundle - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (9):499-506.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
62 ( #182,244 of 2,498,399 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #426,910 of 2,498,399 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes