Utilitas 8 (3):273 (1996)

Authors
Simon Caney
University of Warwick
Abstract
It is a commonplace that in many societies people adhere to profoundly different conceptions of the good. Given this we need to know what political principles are appropriate. How can we treat people who are committed to different accounts of the good with fairness? One recent answer to this pressing question is given by Brian Barry in his important work Justice as Impartiality. This book, of course, contains much more than this. It includes a powerful and incisive discussion of several accounts of distributive justice, a critique of other attempts to defend liberal neutrality and a rebuttal of those who are critical of the ideal of impartiality. In this paper I wish, however, to focus on Barry's defence of liberal neutrality. The paper falls into three parts. Section I outlines the thesis that Barry wants to defend and gives a brief sketch of the argument he employs to defend it. Barry's argument makes two claims – what I have termed the Sceptical Thesis and the Agreement Thesis. Section II therefore critically assesses Barry's defence of the sceptical thesis and Section III examines the agreement thesis
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0953820800005008
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,079
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Realm of Rights.Carl Wellman - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy 89 (6):326-329.
Justice as Impartiality.Brian Barry - 1995 - Philosophy 70 (274):603-605.
Fairness to Goodness.John Rawls - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (4):536-554.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Political Neutrality and Punishment.Matt Matravers - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):217-230.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Liberal Neutrality or Liberal Tolerance?Colin M. Macleod - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (5):529 - 559.
Why Liberal Neutralists Should Accept Educational Neutrality.Matt Sensat Waldren - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):71-83.
Consequentialist Defences of Liberal Neutrality.Simon Caney - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (165):457-477.
The Impossibility of Political Neutrality.Noriaki Iwasa - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):147-155.
Polanyi on Liberal Neutrality.C. P. Goodman - 1996 - Tradition and Discovery 23 (3):38-41.
Neutrality, Liberal Nation Building and Minority Cultural Rights.Zhidas Daskalovski - 2002 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):27-50.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
94 ( #124,256 of 2,506,078 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,078 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes