Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):361 – 364 (1982)
AbstractContrary to Aubert's claim, my paper on election predictions does not seek to draw empirical conclusions from mathematical premisses alone. The empirical premiss, approximated by the continuity assumption, is that sufficiently small changes in the predicted vote will cause only small changes in the actual vote. The technical criticisms by ?fsti and ?sterberg of the reaction function are answered by specifying the function's domain. Other criticisms are also answered, and the reply concludes by placing the election prediction theorem in the context of other theorizing about human expectations and outguessing phenomena
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Similar books and articles
"Election Tribunals, Election Petitions and Justice.Nkeonye Otakpor - 1988 - Journal of Social Philosophy 19 (3):20-30.
Ii. Mathematical Modelling of Election Predictions: Comments to Simon 's Reply.Karl Egil Aubert - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):132 – 134.
Wishful Thinking and Social Inﬂuence in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.Michael K. Miller, Guanchun Wang, Sanjeev R. Kulkarni & Daniel N. Osherson - unknown
The Role of Mathematics in the Exploration of Reality.Karl Egil Aubert - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):353 – 359.
The Subtle Psychology of Voter Turnout.Kosuke Imai, Daniel G. Goldstein & Anja S. Göritz - manuscript
The Self-Prophecy Effect: Increasing Voter Turnout by Vanity-Assisted Consciousness Raising.Mark R. Klinger, Katherine L. Kerr & Mark E. Vande Kamp - unknown
I. Mathematical Modeling of Election Predictions: Final Reply to Professor Aubert.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232.