Does Capital Punishment Deter Homicide?: A Case Study Of Epistemological Objectivity

Metaphilosophy 32 (3):293-307 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper uses the debate about whether capital punishment deters homicide as a case study for examining the claim, made by many feminists and others, that the traditional ideal of objectivity in seeking knowledge is misguided. According to this ideal, knowledge seekers should strive to gather and assess evidence independently of any influences exerted by either their individual and societal circumstances or their moral values. This paper argues that, although the traditional ideal rests on some valid precepts, it is neverthelesss untenable. the author goes on to propose an alternative epistemological ideal – one that retains these valid precepts but also recognizes an important and legitimate role for people's circumstances and moral values in their efforts to find knowledge

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,649

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
50 (#232,999)

6 months
1 (#419,921)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rosalind Simson
Mercer University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references