Cognitio 21 (2):307-320 (2020)

Authors
Waldomiro Silva Filho
Universidade Federal da Bahia
Abstract
In contemporary analytic philosophy, while some epistemologists claim that reflection—understood as a critical self-examination of belief—is a necessary condition for the attribution of valuable epistemic states, others reject this claim and maintain that philosophers tend to overestimate the value of reflection in their reports of epistemological phenomena. In this essay, we present a brief overview of this debate and outline the elements that constitute disagreement between epistemologists. Our diagnosis is that, despite radical disagreement, these positions converge, because they deal with reflection from an individualistic point of view, defining it as an agent’s private metacognitive performance of her own epistemic states. As well as being a reason for disagreement, this conception of reflection may be the reason that epistemologists misunderstand its place and value.
Keywords Reflection  Disagreement  Justification
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):421-423.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reflection On: On Reflection.Declan Smithies - 2016 - Analysis 76 (1):55-69.
Religious Diversity and Disagreement.Matthew A. Benton - 2019 - In Miranda Fricker, Peter Graham, David Henderson & Nikolaj Pedersen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 185-195.
What We Talk About When We Talk About Epistemic Justification.Jack C. Lyons - 2016 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (7-8):867-888.
What is the Epistemic Significance of Disagreement?Noah Gabriel Martin - 2019 - Logos and Episteme: An International Journal of Epistemology 10 (3):283–298.
Skilful Reflection as a Master Virtue.Chienkuo Mi & Shane Ryan - 2020 - Synthese 197 (6):2295-2308.
Religious Disagreement Is Not Unique.Margaret Greta Turnbull - 2021 - In Matthew A. Benton & Jonathan L. Kvanvig (eds.), Religious Disagreement and Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 90-106.
Trading in Values: Disagreement and Rationality in Teaching.Kristin Schaupp - 2015 - American Association of Philosophy Teachers Studies in Pedagogy 1:111-128.
Inferential Justification.Stephen Andrew Fogdall - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Washington
Why Justification Matters.Declan Smithies - 2015 - In David Henderson & John Greco (eds.), Epistemic Evaluation: Point and Purpose in Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 224-244.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-03-10

Total views
76 ( #152,107 of 2,507,560 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #37,112 of 2,507,560 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes