Authors
Abstract
This paper advances the following criticisms against the received view of implicatures: (1) implicatures are relations of pragmatic implication and not attempts to convey particular speaker meanings; (2) conversational implicatures are non-cancellable; (3) generalised conversational implicatures and conventional implicatures are necessary to preserve the cooperative assumption by means of a conversational maxim of conveyability; (4) implicatures should be divided in utterance implicatures and assumption implicatures, not speaker implicatures and sentence implicatures; (5) trivial implicatures are genuine implicatures; (6) Grice’s theory of conversation cannot explain most of his own examples of particularised conversational implicatures; (7) the apparent attempts of explicit cancellation of implicatures are apologies, not attempts to avoid misunderstandings.
Keywords pragmatic implication  implicatures  speaker’s meaning  cancellability  cancellation
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):460-464.

View all 38 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Arguments, Implicatures and Argumentative Implicatures.Andrei Moldovan - 2012 - In Henrique Jales Ribeiro (ed.), Inside Arguments: Logic And The Study of Argumentation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.
Innocent Implicatures.Alexander Dinges - 2015 - Journal of Pragmatics 87:54-63.
Implicature, Inference and Cancellability.Michael Haugh - 2013 - In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy. New York, USA: Springer International Publishing. pp. 133-151.
Modeling Generalized Implicatures Using Non-Monotonic Logics.Jacques Wainer - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (2):195-216.
Omissive Implicature.Eric Swanson - 2017 - Philosophical Topics 45 (2):117-137.
Do Conversational Implicatures Express Arguments?Martina Blečić - 2018 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):335-350.
Do Conversational Implicatures Explain Substitutivity Failures?Cara Spencer - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):126–139.
II—Conventional Implicature, Presupposition, and Lying.Andreas Stokke - 2017 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 91 (1):127-147.
Embedded Implicatures.Francois Recanati - 2003 - Philosophical Perspectives 17 (1):299–332.
Two Types of Implicature: Material and Behavioural.Mark Jary - 2013 - Mind and Language 28 (5):638-660.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-01-30

Total views
232 ( #47,223 of 2,497,995 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #11,286 of 2,497,995 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes