Failure to discount for conflict of interest when evaluating medical literature: a randomised trial of physicians
Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (5):265-270 (2010)
AbstractContext Physicians are regularly confronted with research that is funded or presented by industry. Objective To assess whether physicians discount for conflicts of interest when weighing evidence for prescribing a new drug. Design and setting Participants were presented with an abstract from a single clinical trial finding positive results for a fictitious new drug. Physicians were randomly assigned one version of a hypothetical scenario, which varied on conflict of interest: ‘presenter conflict’, ‘researcher conflict’ and ‘no conflict’. Participants 515 randomly selected Fellows in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network; 253 surveys (49%) were returned. Main object measures The self-reported likelihood that physicians would prescribe the new drug as a first-line therapy. Results Physicians do not significantly discount for conflicts of interest in their self-reported likelihood of prescribing the new drug after reading the single abstract and scenario. However, when asked explicitly to compare conflict and no conflict, 69% report that they would discount for researcher conflict and 57% report that they would discount for presenter conflict. When asked to guess how favourable the results of this study were towards the new drug, compared with the other trials published so far, their perceptions were not significantly influenced by conflict of interest information. Conclusion While physicians believe that they should discount the value of information from conflicted sources, they did not do so in the absence of a direct comparison between two studies. This brings into question the effectiveness of merely disclosing the funding sources of published studies
Similar books and articles
Conflicts of Interest and the Future of Medicine: The United States, France, and Japan.Marc A. Rodwin - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Bias in the Evaluation of Conflict of Interest Policies.Zachariah Sharek, Robert E. Schoen & George Loewenstein - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (2):368-382.
Is it in a neonate's best interest to enter a randomised controlled trial?P. Allmark - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2):110-113.
Evaluating ethics consultation: randomised controlled trial is not the right tool.Y.-Y. Chen & Y.-C. Chen - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (8):594-597.
Medical Professionalism, Revenue Enhancement, and Self-Interest: An Ethically Ambiguous Association. [REVIEW]Jan C. Heller - 2012 - HEC Forum 24 (4):307-315.
Conflicts of interest in science and medicine: the physician’s perspective.Delon Human - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):273-276.
Controversial choice of a control intervention in a trial of ventilator therapy in ARDS: standard of care arguments in a randomised controlled trial.H. Mann - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (9):548-553.
Pharmaceutical “Gift-Giving,” Medical Education, and Conflict of Interest.Dale Murray & Heather Certain - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (9999):335-343.
Conflict of interest and medical publication.Marcus M. Reidenberg - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):455-457.
Physicians, entrepreneurism and the problem of conflict of interest.Ronald M. Green - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (4).
Impact of privacy legislation on the number and characteristics of people who are recruited for research: a randomised controlled trial.L. Trevena - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (8):473-477.
How do parents experience being asked to enter a child in a randomised controlled trial?Valerie Shilling & Bridget Young - 2009 - BMC Medical Ethics 10 (1):1-.
A randomised controlled trial of ribavirin in Crimean Congo haemorrhagic fever: ethical considerations.B. Arda, A. Aciduman & J. C. Johnston - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (2):117-120.
Medicine, Money, and Morals: Physicians' Conflicts of Interest.Marc A. Rodwin - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
A basic concept in the clinical ethics of managed care: Physicians and institutions as economically disciplined moral co-fiduciaries of populations of patients.Laurence B. McCullough - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):77 – 97.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Shadows of Sunlight: Why Disclosure Should Not Be a Priority in Addressing Conflicts of Interest.Daniel S. Goldberg - 2019 - Public Health Ethics 12 (2):202-212.
Potential Conflict of Interest and Bias in the RACGP’s Smoking Cessation Guidelines: Are GPs Provided with the Best Advice on Smoking Cessation for their Patients?Ross MacKenzie & Wendy Rogers - 2015 - Public Health Ethics 8 (3):319-331.
Researcher Views About Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest in Nanotechnology.Katherine A. McComas - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):699-717.
Characteristics of physicians receiving large payments from pharmaceutical companies and the accuracy of their disclosures in publications: an observational study. [REVIEW]Susan L. Norris, Haley K. Holmer, Lauren A. Ogden, Brittany U. Burda & Rongwei Fu - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):24-.
The Influence of Disclosure and Ethics Education on Perceptions of Financial Conflicts of Interest.Donald F. Sacco, Samuel V. Bruton, Alen Hajnal & Chris J. N. Lustgraaf - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (4):875-894.