Corporate Weakness of Will

Journal of Business Ethics:1-17 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Proponents of corporate moral responsibility take certain corporations to be capable of being responsible in ways that do not reduce to the responsibility of their members. If correct, one follow-up question concerns what leads corporations to fail to meet their obligations. We often fail morally when we know what we should do and yet fail to do it, perhaps out of incontinence, akrasia, or weakness of will. However, this kind of failure is much less discussed in the corporate case. And, where it is discussed, the view is that corporations are less prone to weakness. Here, I argue that proponents of corporate responsibility should say that corporations can and often do instantiate weakness of the will, and that this is important to recognize. Weakness of the will requires certain capacities that these proponents typically take corporations to have. And once this is appreciated, we can assess how corporate weakness might proceed differently than how it does for individuals. We can also begin a conversation about how best to meet the distinctive challenges for recognizing and correcting corporate weakness, using a number of resources from management scholarship.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-27

Downloads
121 (#159,469)

6 months
121 (#42,363)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kenneth Silver
Trinity College, Dublin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Group Assertions and Group Lies.Neri Marsili - 2023 - Topoi 42 (2):369-384.
The Corporation as a Moral Person.Peter French - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (3):207 - 215.
Corporate Crocodile Tears? On the Reactive Attitudes of Corporate Agents.Gunnar Björnsson & Kendy Hess - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (2):273–298.
Responsibility incorporated.Philip Pettit - 2007 - Ethics 117 (2):171-201.

View all 55 references / Add more references