The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:173-178 (2007)
AbstractDecline of biodiversity—richness, variety and variability of living beings—is an issue of concern world wide. Nevertheless, not all biological diversity is valued by conservation biologists. Most of them reject an idea of creation of so called A-areas—i.e. maximally rich and diverse biotic areas which have been produced by methods like genetic engineering and species introduction. Reasons for this are considered. A-areas are artefacts: their existence has been intentionally brought about by intentionally modifying their properties in order to produce an entity of their type. Nevertheless, since some restored ecosystems are equally artifacts and still valued over A-areas in biodiversity management, artifactuality cannot alone explain the low value of the A-areas. The essential difference between A-areas and restored ecosystems is in naturalness of their properties. By contrast with the properties of A-areas, the properties of any restored ecosystem are similar to the properties of some ecosystems that have originated through evolutionary processes. I conclude that biodiversity management decisions are based on multiple and different conceptions of natural, unnatural and artificial. The most desired alternatives are natural in all senses of the terms. Because of limits set by the real world, conservation biologists sometimes have to settle for second best alternatives that are unnatural in some sense of the term, but not in all or many of them
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Naturalness in Biological Conservation.Helena Siipi - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (6):457-477.
Naturalness and Conservation in France.Annik Schnitzler, Jean-Claude Génot, Maurice Wintz & Brack W. Hale - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (5):423-436.
Do Non-Native Species Threaten the Natural Environment?Mark Sagoff - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):215-236.
Natural Resources Management in North-East India: Linking Ecology, Economics & Ethics.Ayyanadar Arunachalam & Kusum Arunachalam (eds.) - 2010 - Dvs Publishers.
An Exploration of the Value of Naturalness and Wild Nature.Ben Ridder - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (2):195-213.
Ecological Diversity and Biodiversity as Concepts for Conservation Planning: Comments on Ricotta.Sahotra Sarkar - 2006 - Acta Biotheoretica 54 (2):133-140.
The Principle of Complementarity in the Design of Reserve Networks to Conserve Biodiversity: A Preliminary History.Sahotra Sarkar & James Justus - 2001 - Journal of Biosciences 27:421-435.
Maize: The Native North American’s Legacy of Cultural Diversity and Biodiversity. [REVIEW]S. K. Wertz - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (2):131-156.
Agro-Biodiversity Conservation in Europe: Ethical Issues. [REVIEW]Valeria Negri - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (1):3-25.