Self-mutilation, interpretation, and controversial art

Midwest Studies in Philosophy 27 (1):88–114 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/1475-4975.00074

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Heidegger, Aristotle and the work of art: poiesis in being.Mark Sinclair - 2006 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Art as Its Own Interpretation.Nicholas Maxwell - 2003 - In Andreea Ruvoi (ed.), Interpretation and Its Objects: Studies in the Philosophy of Michael Krausz. Rodopi.
Forbidding intentional mutilation: Some unintended consequences?Heidi M. Giebel - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):467-476.
Are there counterexamples to aesthetic theories of art?Nick Zangwill - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):111–118.
Arts postmodernes, philosophie du langage et phénoménologie.Caroline Guibet Lafaye - 2006 - Studia Phaenomenologica 6:407-424.
The interpretation of texts, people and other artifacts.Daniel C. Dennett - 1990 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50:177-194.
Intention, foresight, and mutilation: A response to Giebel.Christopher Kaczor - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):477-482.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
20 (#703,484)

6 months
4 (#573,918)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jill Sigman
Temple University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The role of theory in aesthetics.Morris Weitz - 1956 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15 (1):27-35.

Add more references