The strong proof from hypotheses and conditionals: Some theorems of deduction for relevant systems

Studia Logica 42 (2-3):165 - 171 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present a modified version of the notion of strong proof from hypotheses (definition D2), and to give three deduction theorems for the relevant logicsR (theoremsT1, andT2) andE (theoremT3).

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf01063836

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The deduction rule and linear and near-linear proof simulations.Maria Luisa Bonet & Samuel R. Buss - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (2):688-709.
A short proof of the strong normalization of classical natural deduction with disjunction.René David & Karim Nour - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (4):1277-1288.
Correspondence results for relational proof systems with application to the Lambek calculus.Wendy MacCaull & Ewa Orłlowska - 2002 - Studia Logica 71 (3):389-414.
Algebraic aspects of deduction theorems.Janusz Czelakowski - 1985 - Studia Logica 44 (4):369 - 387.
Deduction theorems for weak implicational logics.M. W. Bunder - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (2-3):95 - 108.
The problem of noncounterfactual conditionals.David Etlin - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (5):676-688.
Relational proof system for relevant logics.Ewa Orlowska - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#518,760)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references