A major failure within modern analytic philosophy

Philosophy of Science 60 (4):558-567 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper claims that analytic philosophy has failed within the philosophy of science due to the way the dynamic aspect of scientific theories is traditionally treated. On the formal side this failure manifests itself in the first-order logical and the model-theoretic analyses of scientific theories. An amendment of the treatment is sketched. It is based on using model generation, of the kind used in proving the Completeness Theorem for first-order logic, in such a way that some dynamic quantities in the dynamic theory are formally represented as functions relating closed terms and sentences to their interpretations in a generated model

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Doubts about moral principles.Peter Mew - 1975 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):289 – 308.
Gottlob Frege.Kevin C. Klement - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytic/synthetic.Richard Swinburne - 1984 - American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1):31 - 42.
Compactness and independence in non first order frameworks.Itay Ben-Yaacov - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (1):28-50.
Developments in Logic: Carnap, Gödel, and Tarski.Erich H. Reck - 2013 - In Michael Beaney (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 546-571.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#399,999)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1903 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 11 (4):11-12.
Der logische Aufbau der Welt.Rudolf Carnap - 1928 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 8:106-107.

View all 9 references / Add more references