Illusions [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 22 (3):575-575 (1969)

Abstract
The Pegram Lectures at Brookhaven National Laboratory are designed to provide a forum to consider the question of the interaction among science, the humanities, and society at large. Just before Maurois was to deliver these lectures in 1967 he became fatally ill. However, the manuscript had been prepared and was delivered by Jacques Barzun. These lectures along with prefatory remarks by Barzun and E. Morot-Sir of the French Embassy comprise Illusions. There are three lectures by Maurois. The first begins by cataloguing various everyday illusions, mostly optical. It discusses dreams, the difference between illusion and hallucination, the role of interpretation of reality in the creation of illusion, and the distinction between who we are as opposed to whom we play. In short it reminds us that, for various reasons, we do not see the world as it is. The second lecture shows how science tries to correct our distorted pictures of reality. Science is largely successful in this effort, says Maurois, although inasmuch as men need to interpret what science discovers, the door is still open for illusion. Moreover, inasmuch as scientists are men, science is not above producing some illusions of its own. The third and perhaps the most contrived lecture explores the world of willful illusions: the fine arts. Here Maurois suggests some differences and similarities between art and science, and explores the technological interaction between the two. He concludes that illusion will always be with us and that in fact it is "the stuff of which our life is made."-S. O. H.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0034-6632
DOI revmetaph196922352
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,259
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Susceptibility to Optical Illusions: Specific or General?M. A. Tinker - 1938 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 22 (6):593.
Theory-Laden Experience and Illusions.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2011 - Ethos: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences 4 (2):58-67.
The Illusions of Scientists Vs. The Illusions of Social Epistemologists.E. C. - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):343-351.
Dissipating Illusions.Eldon C. Wait - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (2):221-242.
“Can Do” Attitudes: Some Positive Illusions Are Not Misbeliefs.Owen Flanagan - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):519 - 520.
The Openness of Illusions.Louise Antony - 2011 - Philosophical Issues 21 (1):25-44.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-18

Total views
22 ( #515,582 of 2,518,720 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,822 of 2,518,720 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes