The Ultimate Moral Arbiter, Received Tradition or Autonomous Reason? Some Questions Concerning Morality and Development in Confucian Ethics

Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 14 (2):219-224 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Problem of Autonomy in Confucian Ethics.Yu-yu Liu - 2006 - Modern Philosophy 6:105-111.
Recent Approaches to Confucian Filial Morality.Hagop Sarkissian - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (9):725-734.
The morality of autonomous robots.Aaron M. Johnson & Sidney Axinn - 2013 - Journal of Military Ethics 12 (2):129 - 141.
"WHY BE MORAL?" The Cheng Brothers' neo-confucian answer.Yong Huang - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (2):321-353.
Confucian ethics and emotions.Yunping Wang - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (3):352-365.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-09

Downloads
27 (#576,320)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The methods of ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1874 - Bristol, U.K.: Thoemmes Press. Edited by Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones.
The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1874 - Bristol, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones.
The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1907 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 30 (4):401-401.

Add more references