Preemption, Prevention and Predation: Why the Bush Strategy is Dangerous

Philosophic Exchange 35 (1) (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In September of 2002, the administration of President George W. Bush announced its policy of preemption. This policy is actually equivalent to a policy of preventive war. The principal difficulty with this policy is that it will incite fear in governments who would not otherwise attack us, and thereby incite them to hostile action. Thus the policy actually makes the world a more dangerous place.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

American Social Sciences and the Bush Doctrine.Chao-wu Dai - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:1-9.
Rationality and Politics.[author unknown] - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (1):1-2.
Preventive War and U.S. Foreign Policy.Marc Trachtenberg - 2007 - In Henry Shue & David Rodin (eds.), Preemption: Military Action and Moral Justification. Oxford University Press.
Military and Civil Reasons For Just Behavior in War.Ovadia Ezra - 2012 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 19 (2):39-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-24

Downloads
6 (#1,389,828)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references