Ethical Dilemmas and Radioactive Waste

Environmental Ethics 13 (4):327-343 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The accidents at Three Mile Island and Chemobyl have slowed the development of commercial nuclear fission in most industrialized countries, although nuclear proponents are trying to develop smaller, allegedly “fail-safe” reactors. Regardless of whether or not they succeed, we will face the problem of radioactive wastes for the next million years. After a brief, “revisionist” history of the radwaste problem, Isurvey some of the major epistemological and ethical difficulties with storing nuclear wastes and outline four ethical dilemmas common to many technological and environmental controversies. I suggest two solutions to these ethical dilemmas and show why they are also economical and realistic proposals.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
100 (#167,577)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kristin Shrader-Frechette
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Self-control: Beyond commitment.Howard Rachlin - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):109-121.
Teleological behaviorism and the intentional scheme.Hugh Lacey - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):134-135.
Equity and nuclear waste disposal.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 1994 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7 (2):133-156.
The future of an illusion: Self and its control.Peter R. Killeen - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):133-134.

View all 35 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references