Wittgensteinian developmental investigations

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):121-122 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I criticize Carpendale & Lewis's (C&L) attempt to produce a Wittgensteinian theory, as an alternative to work in the “theory of mind” tradition, not because I disagree with it as theory, but because Wittgenstein would be critical of any attempt to make such a use of his work. His concern is with descriptions, not theories.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,362

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
28 (#670,413)

6 months
7 (#564,683)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John David Shotter
University of New Hampshire, Durham

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references