Why being dialogical must come before being logical: the need for a hermeneutical–dialogical approach to robotic activities

AI and Society 34 (1):29-35 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Currently, our official rationality is still of a Cartesian kind; we are still embedded in a mechanistic order that takes it that separate, countable entities (spatial forms), related logically to each other, are the only ‘things’ that matter to us—an order clearly suited to advances in robotics. Unfortunately, it is an order that renders invisible ‘relational things’, non-objective things that exist in time, in the transitions from one state of affairs to another, things that ‘point’ toward possibilities in the future, which mean something to us. I have called such things, hermeneutical–dialogical ‘things’ as they gradually emerge in our back-and-forth, step-by-step relations to the others and otherneses in our surroundings; they consist in the ‘promissory’ things sustaining our trust in each other and in our authorities, in our social organizations and social institutions, and in our culture. Clearly, we need to understand better, not only what robots can, and cannot do, but also the long-term ethical and political implications of inserting robotic activities into our everyday ways of relating ourselves to our surroundings if we are to avoid the dystopian futures envisaged by some. Descartes’ aim of “making ourselves, as it were, masters and possessors of nature,” forgets our larger task of our making ourselves into human beings—of doing together in dialog what we cannot do apart.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dialogical realities: The ordinary, the everyday, and other strange new worlds.John Shotter - 1997 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 27 (2&3):345–357.
A Curious Dialogical Logic and its Composition Problem.Sara L. Uckelman, Jesse Alama & Aleks Knoks - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (6):1065-1100.
Processes and Pitfalls of Dialogical Bioethics.Abraham Rudnick - 2007 - Health Care Analysis 15 (2):123-135.
The Ground of Dialogical Bioethics.Abraham Rudnick - 2002 - Health Care Analysis 10 (4):391-402.
Implicit Versus Explicit Knowledge in Dialogical Logic.Manuel Rebuschi - 2009 - In Ondrej Majer, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Tero Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy. Springer Verlag. pp. 229--246.
First-Order Dialogical Games and Tableaux.Nicolas Clerbout - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (4):785-801.
The Dialogical Turn of Public Relation Ethics.Robert van Es & Tiemo Meijlink - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1/2):69 - 77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-01

Downloads
21 (#630,965)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John David Shotter
University of New Hampshire, Durham

Citations of this work

In defense of the Turing test.Eric Neufeld & Sonje Finnestad - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (4):819-827.
Imitation Game: Threshold or Watershed?Eric Neufeld & Sonje Finnestad - 2020 - Minds and Machines 30 (4):637-657.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe.
Phenomenology of Perception.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1945 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Donald A. Landes.
Phenomenology of Perception.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1962 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Donald A. Landes.
Phenomenology of Perception.Aron Gurwitsch, M. Merleau-Ponty & Colin Smith - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (3):417.
Logic: The Theory of Inquiry.John Dewey - 1938 - New York, NY, USA: Henry Holt.

View all 25 references / Add more references