- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Jensen's data on Spearman's hypothesis: No artifact
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (3):512-512 (1987)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Some new results on the Spearman hypothesis artifact.Peter H. SchÖnemann - 1989 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (5):462-464.
The Spearman-Jensen hypothesis.R. Travis Osborne - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):351-352.
Further evidence for Spearman's hypothesis concerning black–white differences on psychometric tests.Arthur R. Jensen - 1987 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (3):512-519.
Jensen's support for Spearman's hypothesis is support for a circular argument.James R. Wilson - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):246-246.
The nature of the black–white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis.Arthur R. Jensen - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):193-219.
Jensen, Spearman's g, and Ghazali's dates: A commentary on interracial peace.Panos D. Bardis - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):219-220.
Spearman's principle.Marc Lange - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):503-521.
Who owns the data in a clinical trial?Jeffrey M. Drazen - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):407-411.
Artifact Categorization. Trends and Problems.Massimiliano Carrara & Daria Mingardo - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):351-373.
Arguments for the existence of God.R. G. Swinburne - 1984 - In J. Houston (ed.), Is it reasonable to believe in God? Edinburgh: Handsel Press. pp. 121 - 133.
Arguments for the Existence of God IN Key Themes in Philosophy.R. G. Swinburne - 1989 - In . Cambridge University Press.
Review of Creations of the Mind, ed. Margolis and Laurence. [REVIEW]Brian Epstein - 2012 - Mind 121 (481):200-204.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
35 (#431,398)
6 months
6 (#417,196)
2014-01-20
Downloads
35 (#431,398)
6 months
6 (#417,196)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Insensitivity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment interaction.Douglas Wahlsten - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):109-120.
Trying to shoot the messenger for his message.Robert Plomin - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):144-144.
A nemesis for heritability estimation.Jerry Hirsch - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):137-138.
How does one apply statistical analysis to our understanding of the development of human relationships.Oscar Kempthorne - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):138-139.
Thinking Critically about Race and Genetics.Rose M. Brewer - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (3):513-519.
References found in this work
The nature of the black–white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis.Arthur R. Jensen - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):193-219.
Oh g Dr. Jensen! or, g-ing up cognitive psychology?P. M. A. Rabbitt - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):238-239.
On artificial intelligence.Peter H. Schönemann - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):241-242.
Implications of valid IQ differences: An unstatesmanlike view.Robert A. Gordon - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):343-344.
Intelligence and g: An imaginative treatment of unimaginative data.Raymond B. Cattell - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (2):227-228.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-sqt28 uwo