CHAPTER 3: Additions to Standard Analyses II: Limitations on the Presence of Falsehoods in Justification

In The Analysis of Knowing: A Decade of Research. Princeton University Press. pp. 81-95 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conditions and analyses of knowing.Robert K. Shope - 2002 - In Paul K. Moser (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 25--70.
The Centrality of Problem‐Solving.John Kekes - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):405 – 421.
Knowledge and normativity.Clayton Littlejohn - 2018 - In Markos Valaris & Stephen Hetherington (eds.), Knowledge in Contemporary Philosophy. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Truthlikeness.Graham Oddie - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia.
The Instability of the Standard Justification for Physician-Assisted Suicide.Thomas A. Cavanaugh - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (1):103-109.
The Philosophical Basis of Cost-Risk-Benefit Analyses.David A. Bantz - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:227 - 242.


Added to PP

13 (#950,112)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Shope
University of Massachusetts, Boston

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references