Abstract
In this elegant, smoothly written book, David Carr provides nothing less than
a defense of both Kantian and Husserlian versions of transcendental philosophy
against Heidegger’s critique of metaphysics. Carr’s Paradox of Subjectivity
is organized into four parts. In the first part, Carr provides a synopsis
of Heidegger’s interpretation of traditional metaphysics. Part two is devoted
to a reconstruction of Kant’s transcendental theory of subjectivity. The third
part deals with Husserl’s conception of transcendental subjectivity. Finally, in
part four, Carr proposes to show that, for both Kant and Husserl, transcendental
subjectivity is a purely methodological implement, which cannot in
turn be reified into serving the role traditionally reserved for metaphysical
substance. Instead, transcendental subjectivity is to be understood as itself a
critical regard of traditional metaphysics. Moreover, such a strictly methodological
conception of transcendental subjectivity cannot be assimilated into
Heidegger’s conception of metaphysics. Consequently, Heidegger’s critique
of metaphysics cannot be extended as a critique of either Kant or Husserl