The apparent length of tilted lines

, &
Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (4):548 (1949)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0060386

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. II. Simultaneous contrast and the areal restriction of the after-effect. [REVIEW]J. J. Gibson - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (6):553.
Perceived length depends on exposure duration: Straight lines and Muller-Lyer stimuli.Albert Erlebacher & Robert Sekuler - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (4):724.
Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies.J. J. Gibson & M. Radner - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (5):453.
Influence of frame size on apparent length of a line.Theodor M. Künnapas - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (3):168.
'Political correctness' and the need to criticise religion.Aaron Sloman - manuscript
Influence of word frequency and length on the apparent duration of tachistoscopic presentations.Joel S. Warm & Ronald E. McCray - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):56.
The retention of the ability to draw lines of a given length blindfold.E. O. Bregman, E. L. Thorndike & E. Woodyard - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (1):78.
Some remarks on lengths of propositional proofs.Samuel R. Buss - 1995 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 34 (6):377-394.
Is A New Life Possible? Deleuze and the Lines.Miranda Luis de - 2013 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 7 (1):106-152.
The Conception of Line in Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty.Sue L. Cataldi - 1988 - Philosophy Today 32 (4):327-337.
What is length?Frank Henmueller & Karl Menger - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (2):172-177.
Hume and Berkeley on the proofs of infinite divisibility.Robert Fogelin - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (1):47-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
15 (#868,066)

6 months
4 (#573,918)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references