On stipulation

European Journal of Philosophy 29 (4):1100-1114 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


When we carry out a speech act of stipulation, it seems that we can shape our language however we see fit. This autonomy, however, also seems to make such acts arbitrary: it is unclear if there are any constraints on what counts as a "correct" or "incorrect" stipulation. In this paper, I offer a novel, detailed account of the pragmatics of stipulation and explain its crucial role in conceptual analysis and articulation. My account shows that stipulation does indeed equip us with a key tool for changing our linguistic practices, but that such acts can nonetheless count as meaningfully, normatively constrained: they are always subject to felicitous criticism and the possibility of defeat by others. I then examine the metaphilosophical implications of this account. Philosophers often describe the project of conceptual analysis as having a crucial stipulative dimension, but they rarely explain what they take this act to consist in. On my view, speech acts of stipulation are best understood as acts that generate a shared inferential entitlement for speaker and audience, an entitlement justified on the basis of its utility. In developing this account, I distinguish stipulations from more familiar speech act kinds such as assertions and commands, synthesize and criticize alternative views of stipulation in the literature, and discuss the relationship between stipulation and seemingly kindred speech acts (such as assumptions, suppositions, and proposals).

Similar books and articles

An Investigation on the Descriptive Origin of Paradox.Tianen Wang - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 75:249-255.
Definition of Conversion from Ibn Sina's Point of View.Saeed Anvari & Rooh Allah Alami - 2008 - Avicennian Philosophy Journal 12 (40):102-124.
E-sports are Not Sports.Jim Parry - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 13 (1):3-18.
Note on heterologicality.D. Bostock - 2011 - Analysis 71 (2):252-259.
Philosophical Speech Acts.Matthew Shields - 2020 - Philosophy 95 (4):497-521.
Semantic Stipulation and Knowledge De Re.Chris Tillman & Joshua Spencer - 2012 - In William Kabasenche, Michael O’Rourke & Matthew Slater (eds.), Reference and Referring: Topics in Contemporary Philosophy, Volume 10. Cambridge, MA: pp. 119-148.
On the Synthetic Content of Implicit Definitions.Demetra Christopoulou - 2013 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 22 (1):75-88.
Imagination, stipulation and vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1997 - Philosophical Issues 8:215-228.
A Dilemma for Neo-Fregeanism.Robert Trueman - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (3):361-379.
On a special stipulation of Frege.R. D. Gallie - 1973 - Mind 82 (327):445-449.


Added to PP

82 (#150,229)

6 months
19 (#56,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Shields
University College Dublin

Citations of this work

Rethinking conspiracy theories.Matthew Shields - 2022 - Synthese 200 (4):1-29.
Conceptual domination.Matthew Shields - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):15043-15067.
Norms of Constatives.Grzegorz Gaszczyk - forthcoming - Acta Analytica:1-20.
Conceptual Change and Future Paths for Pragmatism.Matthew Shields - 2021 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 59 (3):405-434.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Scorekeeping in a language game.David Lewis - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):339--359.
Verbal Disputes.David J. Chalmers - 2011 - Philosophical Review 120 (4):515-566.
Asserting.Robert Brandom - 1983 - Noûs 17 (4):637-650.

View all 12 references / Add more references