Aleksander Peczenik, Lars Lindahl and Bert van Roermund, eds., Theory of Legal Science Reviewed by

Philosophy in Review 6 (6):292-294 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aleksander Peczenik, On Law and Reason Reviewed by.Roger A. Shiner - 1992 - Philosophy in Review 12 (1):55-57.
Essays in legal theory.Aleksander Peczenik - 1970 - København,: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne, eksp.: DBK.
Can Philosophy Help Legal Doctrine?Aleksander Peczenik - 2004 - Ratio Juris 17 (1):106-117.
Morality Incorporated? Some Peculiarities of Legal Thinking.Bert Roermund & Jan Vranken - 2009 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 38 (2):136-146.
Legal Knowledge about What?Aleksander Peczenik & Jaap Hage - 2000 - Ratio Juris 13 (3):326-345.
Bert van Roermund, Law, Narrative and Reality Reviewed by.Steven Lee - 1999 - Philosophy in Review 19 (4):287-289.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-16

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references