- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Wake of Berkeley's Analyst: Rigor Mathematicae?
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 18 (4):455 (1987)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Berkeley's philosophy of mathematics.Jennifer Trusted - 1995 - History of European Ideas 21 (1):105-106.
The Mathematical Ideas of George Berkeley.Jose Antonio Robles-Garcia - 1990 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Consedirações a Respeito do Problema do Rigor Matemático em "O Analista", de Berk.Alex Calazans - 2008 - Cadernos de História E Filosofia da Ciéncia 18 (2).
De Motu and the Analyst: A Modern Edition, with Introductions and Commentary.George Berkeley & Douglas Michael Jesseph - 1991 - Springer.
Łos J.. On the extending of models . Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 42 , pp. 38–54.Łos J. and Suszko R.. On the extending of models . Common extensions. Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 42 , pp. 343–347.Słomiński J.. On the extending of models . Extensions in equationally definable classes of algebras. Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 43 , pp. 69–76.Łos J. and Suszko R.. On the extending of models . Infinite sums of models. Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 44 , pp. 52–60. [REVIEW]H. Jerome Keisler - 1962 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 27 (1):93-95.
The analyst: A discourse addressed to an infidel mathematician.George Berkeley - 1734 - Wilkins, David R.. Edited by David R. Wilkins.
De motu and The Analyst: A Modern Edition, with Introductions and Commentary. George Berkeley, Douglas M. Jesseph.D. Bertoloni Meli - 1993 - Isis 84 (3):584-585.
Hanf W.. On a problem of Erdös and Tarski. Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 53 no. 3 , pp. 325–334.Monk D. and Scott D.. Additions to some results of Erdös and Tarski. Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 53 no. 3 , pp. 335–343.Hajnal A.. Remarks on the theory of W. P. Hanf. Fundamenta mathematicae vol. 54 no. 1 , pp. 109–113. [REVIEW]Jean A. Larson - 1974 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (2):332-332.
Berkeleys Kritik am Leibniz´schen calculus.Horst Struve, Eva Müller-Hill & Ingo Witzke - 2015 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (1):63-82.
De motu and The Analyst: A Modern Edition, with Introductions and Commentary by George Berkeley; Douglas M. Jesseph. [REVIEW]D. Meli - 1993 - Isis 84:584-585.
Mycielski Jan and Steinhaus H.. A mathematical axiom contradicting the axiom of choice. Bulletin de l'Académie Polonaise des Sciences, Série des sciences mathématiques, astronomiques et physiques, vol. 10 , pp. 1–3.Mycielski Jan. On the axiom of determinateness. Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 53 , pp. 205–224.Mycielski Jan and Świerczkowski S.. On the Lebesgue measurability and the axiom of determinateness. Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 54 , pp. 67–71.Mycielski Jan. On the axiom of determinateness . Fundamenta mathematicae, vol. 59 , pp. 203–212. [REVIEW]James E. Baumgartner - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (1):164-166.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-02
Downloads
82 (#200,222)
6 months
13 (#185,110)
2010-09-02
Downloads
82 (#200,222)
6 months
13 (#185,110)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Kant’s Mereological Account of Greater and Lesser Actual Infinities.Daniel Smyth - 2023 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 105 (2):315-348.
Infinitesimals as an issue of neo-Kantian philosophy of science.Thomas Mormann & Mikhail Katz - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science (2):236-280.
Interpreting the Infinitesimal Mathematics of Leibniz and Euler.Jacques Bair, Piotr Błaszczyk, Robert Ely, Valérie Henry, Vladimir Kanovei, Karin U. Katz, Mikhail G. Katz, Semen S. Kutateladze, Thomas McGaffey, Patrick Reeder, David M. Schaps, David Sherry & Steven Shnider - 2017 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 48 (2):195-238.
Who Gave You the Cauchy–Weierstrass Tale? The Dual History of Rigorous Calculus.Alexandre Borovik & Mikhail G. Katz - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (3):245-276.
A Burgessian Critique of Nominalistic Tendencies in Contemporary Mathematics and its Historiography.Karin Usadi Katz & Mikhail G. Katz - 2012 - Foundations of Science 17 (1):51-89.
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo