Science Defended, Science Defined: The Louisiana Creationism Case

Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (4):517-539 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On August 18, 1986, seventy-two Nobel laureates, seventeen state academies of science, and seven other scientific organizations submitted an amicus curiae brief to the Supreme Court of the United States in which they defined and agreed upon the nature and scope of science. The brief was submitted in response to the Louisiana Balanced TreatmentAct for creation science and evolution science that had been struck down in the Federal Court of Louisiana in 1985 and was being appealed to the Supreme Court. The Louisiana trial in general and the amicus curiae brief in particular have historical significance for the history of science, being unique in the collective mobilization of scientists both in defense of and in defining science. This article describes the origin and significance of the brief.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From Dayton to Little Rock: Creationism Evolves.Dorothy Nelkin - 1982 - Science, Technology and Human Values 7 (3):47-53.
Edwards v. Aguillard: The Supreme Court's Deconstruction of Louisiana's Creationism Statute.Paul Blewett - 1988 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 3 (4):663.
The Role of History in Science.Richard Creath - 2010 - Journal of the History of Biology 43 (2):207 - 214.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
6 (#1,434,892)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Arguing from the Evidence.Brian A. Thomasson - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (4):495-534.
Arguing from the Evidence.Brian A. Thomasson - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (4):495-534.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge.Paul Feyerabend - 1974 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
Psychologie des foules.G. Le Bon - 1896 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 41:79-85.
Psychologie des Foules.G. Le Bon - 1895 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 3 (6):1-1.
Commentary: Science v. Creation-Science.William A. Thomas - 1986 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 11 (3):47-51.

Add more references