Response to: Commentary: What Is Art Good For? The Socio-Epistemic Value of Art

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Relativism, Particularism and Reflective Equilibrium.Howard Sankey - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (2):281-292.
Epistemic Badness.Anthony T. Flood - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:253-262.
A Case for Epistemic Agency.Dustin Olson - 2015 - Logos and Episteme 6 (4):449-474.
Epistemic Badness.Anthony T. Flood - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:253-262.
The Right in the Good: A Defense of Teleological Non-Consequentialism in Epistemology.Clayton Littlejohn - 2018 - In Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij & Jeff Dunn (eds.), Epistemic Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 23-47.
Why the epistemic relativist cannot use the sceptic’s strategy. A comment on Sankey.Markus Seidel - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):134-139.
An epistemic value theory.Dennis Whitcomb - 2007 - Dissertation, Rutgers

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-07

Downloads
11 (#1,070,627)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Clair Morrissey
Occidental College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references