Abstract
The repertory grid method was used to determine what terminology respondents use to distinguish between different applications of genetic engineering drawn from food- related, agricultural, and medical applications. Respondents were asked to react to fifteen applications phrased in general terms, and results compared with a second study where fifteen more specific applications were used as stimuli. Both sets of data were submitted to generalized Procrustes analysis. Applications associated with animals or human genetic material were described as causing ethical concern, being unnatural, harmful, and dangerous. Those involving plants or microorganisms were described as beneficial, progressive, and necessary. The results were validated in survey research, which indicated that general applications ofgenetic engineering were perceived as either positive or negative, whereas specific applications were more highly differentiated in perceptual terms. The results imply that the public debate about genetic engineering must take due account of the complexity of public concerns.
Keywords Agriculture  Attitude  Biomedical and Behavioral Research  DNA, Recombinant  Data Collection  Ecology  Empirical Approach  Food  Genetic Engineering  Genetics and Reproduction  Hazardous Substances  Methods  Microbiology  Morals  Organisms, Genetically Modified  Public Opinion  Risk  Risk Assessment  Terminology as Topic  United Kingdom
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/016224399702200105
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Lay Discourses of Science: Science-in-General, Science-in-Particular, and Self.Mike Michael - 1992 - Science, Technology and Human Values 17 (3):313-333.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Autonomous Driving and Perverse Incentives.Wulf Loh & Catrin Misselhorn - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (4):575-590.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Genetic Engineering.Kevin Wilger - 2019 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 19 (4):601-615.
Embracing Change with All Four Arms: Post-Humanist Defense of Genetic Engineering.J. Hughes - 1996 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 6 (4):94-101.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-11-26

Total views
1 ( #1,558,302 of 2,533,484 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #391,480 of 2,533,484 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes