On Dynamic Pitch Benefit for Speech Recognition in Speech Masker

Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Previous work demonstrated that dynamic pitch (i.e., pitch variation in speech) aids speech recognition in various types of noises. While this finding suggests dynamic pitch enhancement in target speech can benefit speech recognition in noise, it is of importance to know what noise characteristics affect dynamic pitch benefit and who will benefit from enhanced dynamic pitch cues. Following our recent finding that temporal modulation in noise influences dynamic pitch benefit, we examined the effect of speech masker characteristics on dynamic pitch benefit. Specifically, the first goal of the study was to test the hypothesis that dynamic pitch benefit varies depending on the availability of pitch cues in the masker and the intelligibility of masker. The second goal of this study was to investigate whether older listeners as a group can benefit from dynamic pitch for speech recognition in speech maskers. In addition, individual factors of hearing loss and working memory capacity were examined for their impact on older listeners’ dynamic pitch benefit. Twenty-three younger listeners with normal hearing and 37 older listeners with varying levels of hearing sensitivity participated the study, in which speech reception thresholds were measured with sentences in speech maskers. While we did not find an effect of masker characteristics on dynamic pitch benefit, the results showed older listeners can benefit from dynamic pitch for recognizing speech in speech maskers. The data also suggest that among those older listeners with hearing loss, dynamic pitch benefit is stronger for individuals with higher working memory capacity. This can be attributed to their ability to exploit facilitated lexical access in processing of degraded speech signal.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Perceptual units in speech recognition.Dominic W. Massaro - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (2):199.
II—Jane Heal: Illocution, Recognition and Cooperation.Jane Heal - 2013 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 87 (1):137-154.
Merging information versus speech recognition.Irene Appelbaum - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):325-326.
Is unsaying polite?Berislav Žarnić - 2012 - In Majda Trobok, Nenad Miščević & Berislav Žarnić (eds.), Between Logic and Reality: Modeling Inference, Action and Understanding. Springer. pp. 201--224.
Recognition of continuous speech requires top-down processing.Kenneth N. Stevens - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):348-348.
Tonal Qualia and the Evolution of Music.Piotr Podlipniak - 2017 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 8 (1):33-44.
Locus equation and hidden parameters of speech.Li Deng - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):263-264.
Content first, frame later.John J. Ohala - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):525-526.
Oppressive speech.Mary Kate McGowan - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):389 – 407.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-23

Downloads
4 (#1,517,814)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?Alan Baddeley - 2000 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (11):417-423.
Object-based auditory and visual attention.Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham - 2008 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (5):182.

Add more references