Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):328-341 (2006)

Abstract
Both opponents and proponents of the death penalty express faith in science and in DNA evidence to justify their positions. This article examines the production of forensic evidence as a social activity and suggests that tendencies toward bias and error may not apply symmetrically in inculpation and exoneration contexts
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00038.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Evidence Law Adrift.Mirjan R. Damaška - 1997 - Yale University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-30

Total views
59 ( #194,950 of 2,519,267 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,267 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes