Abstract

This article wants to explore Hegel's "abandoned deposit rose" by Bada Ye's "transgression" and then to Derrida, "Difference" changes. We first briefly describe the ideas of Hegel's historical influence of contemporary French philosophy, the attempt to transition from Hegel to Derrida to show how Derrida's deconstruction of his philosophy to block the Hegelian negative dialectics . First, Derrida will be "abandoned deposit rose," translated as "to replace and discard" , explained his understanding of Hegel's dialectic as a process of elimination rather than save, especially with regard to Hegel's semiology. Hegel's semiotics there are apparent from the teleological established, and the Hegelian dialectic set in the hierarchy of the source. It is from this level system is established, we find that there appear teleology inherent in Western logic-centrism and voice-centrism . Moreover, from Derrida's reading of the Bada Ye, Hegel can be seen as another "abandoned deposit rose," the block, from which can be found in Hegel's dialectical synthesis is replaced with "non-sense" , this non-sense dualism to maintain the vitality of the conflict and lead us to reconsider the limits and boundaries of philosophy. Therefore, the Bada Ye use the "transgression", "sovereignty" , the words can be regarded as block "abandoned deposit rose" and refused belonged to the master-slave dialectic of reason. Finally, Derrida "difference" the invention of the collapse of the Hegelian dialectic in trying to "time than space, sound better than the image" of the established hierarchy. As the "difference" in the "a" in the pronunciation and can not be identified with the French in "differences." Derrida try to silence his philosophy to be included in the experiment. Since this is a created word, so there can not be any referential things , will not be able to return there of origin. Through the "difference" to the phonetic rules of the transgression, "difference" does not exist, but there appear showing the meaning of reflection. "Difference" of the invention makes no difference in the origin of thinking is possible. This article would like to investigate the transformation taking place from Hegel's Aufhebung to Derrida's Différance, passing by Bataille's Transgression. We explain briefly the historical influence of Hegel's thought on contemporary French philosophy. The subsequent transformation, from Hegel to Derrida, shows how Derrida interrupts the operation of Hegel's negative dialectics in his deconstructive philosophy. Firstly, the translation of Aufhebung as relève, illustrates Derrida's understanding of Hegel's texts as a process of exclusion and not of conservation, especially as regards Hegel's semiology. The latter is established by the teleology of presence , which is the source of the hierarchy in Hegelian dialectics. And exactly from the erection of this hierarchy, we find the teleology of presence implying the logocentrism and phonocentrism of Western philosophy. Secondly, in Derrida's appreciation of Georges Bataille, like another form of interruption of Hegel, we observe that the Hegelian dialectical synthesis is replaced by a non-meaning which conserves the dynamic conflict of dualism and leads us to reconsider the limits and boundaries of philosophy. Thus Georges Bataille used other words: 'transgression' and 'sovereignty' , etc ... to interrupt the Aufhebung submitting to rationality in the master-slave dialectic. Thirdly, the invention of the word 'différance' attempts to crash the superiority of time over space or that of sound over figure in Hegel's dialectics. The ' a 'of' différance 'cannot be observed by pronunciation and confused with' différence 'with' e '. It is precisely that silence, as the boundary of sound, will be integrated into Derrida's philosophical experiment. Moreover, it is impossible to refer' différance 'to any being-present, even to the origin of Being. Through the transgression of orthography, the non-presence of' différance 'is the necessary reflection of presence. The' différance 'makes possible the thinking of difference without origin