Why ‘normal’ feels so bad: violence and vaginal examinations during labour – a (feminist) phenomenology

Feminist Theory 22 (3):443-463 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I argue that many women lack the epistemic resources that would allow them to recognise the practice of vaginal examinations during childbirth as violent or as unnecessary and potentially declinable. I address vaginal examinations during childbirth as a special case of obstetric violence, in which women frequently lack the epistemic resources necessary to recognise the practice as violent not only because of the inherent difficulty of recognising violence that happens in an ‘essentially benevolent’ setting such as the medical one, but also, and mainly, due to the pervasive sexual reification of women under patriarchy and the pervasive shame to which women are subjected. My argument is that the practice of vaginal examinations is indeed experienced – bodily apprehended – as violent by many women, but that full epistemic recognition of this violence is frequently obstructed because the experience perfectly coincides with the normal phenomenological situation of women within patriarchy and thus cannot really be framed as violent. A phenomenological analysis presenting the embodied experience of women under patriarchy as always already essentially tied to sexual availability and commodification, and to shame, will explain this epistemological impairment. A phenomenological take on Judith Butler’s distinction between ‘recognition’ and ‘apprehension’ informs my analysis: I deploy it to provide a richer, more nuanced response to the question of why vaginal examinations are not fully recognised and expressed as violent – even when they are, frequently, apprehended as such. Furthermore, Butler’s ideas about the epistemic ‘framings’ through which we make sense of different kinds of lives will help me to explain how the patriarchal sexual reification of women in fact already frames sexual violence as not-violence – which ultimately also prevents labouring women from recognising vaginal examinations during labour as violence.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to be a "good" medical student.D. K. Sokol - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):612-612.
Law’s Violence: Reshaping Jurisprudence.Rosemary Hunter - 2006 - Law and Critique 17 (1):27-46.
Violencia Y crueldad.Michel Wieviorka - 2003 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 37:155-171.
A Foucauldian-Feminist Understanding of Patterns of Sexual Violence in Conflict.Harriet Gordon - 2018 - Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence 2 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-30

Downloads
4 (#1,239,317)

6 months
3 (#225,457)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?