European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (online early):1-14 (2022)

Nicholas Shackel
Cardiff University
The Nothing from Infinity paradox arises when the combination of two infinitudes of point particles meet in a supertask and disappear. Corral-Villate claims that my arguments for disappearance fail and concedes that this failure also produces an extreme kind of indeterminism, which I have called plenitudinous. So my supertask at least poses a dilemma of extreme indeterminism within Newtonian point particle mechanics. Plenitudinous indeterminism might be trivial, although easy attempts to prove it so seem to fail in the face of plausible continuity principles. However, the question of its triviality is here moot, since I show that, except in one case, Corral-Villate’s disproofs fail, and with a correction, the original arguments are unrefuted. Consequently, of the two contenders for the outcome of my supertask, the Nothing from Infinity paradox has won out.
Keywords Nothing from Infinity paradox  vanishing indeterminism  plenitudinous indeterminism  composition argument  continuity principle  continuity argument
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s13194-022-00463-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Perspectives on Infinity.Graham Oppy - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
A Beautiful Supertask.Jon Perez Laraudogoitia - 1996 - Mind 105 (417):81-83.
On Shackel’s nothing from infinity paradox.Amaia Corral-Villate - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10 (3):1-13.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

New Zeno and Actual Infinity.Hansen Casper - 2011 - Open Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):57-60.
New Zeno and Actual Infinity.Casper Storm Hansen - 2011 - Open Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):57.
Бесконечный Лжец.Vsevolod Ladov - 2014 - Schole 8 (2):285-292.
The Two-Envelope Paradox.Michael Clark & Nicholas Shackel - 2000 - Mind 109 (435):415--442.
The Inverse Spaceship Paradox.J. P. Laraudogoitia - 2011 - Synthese 178 (3):429-435.
Some Paradoxes of Infinity Revisited.Yaroslav Sergeyev - 2022 - Mediterranian Journal of Mathematics 19:143.
Aristotelian Infinity.John Bowin - 2007 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32:233-250.
How Are Concepts of Infinity Acquired?Kazimierz Trzęsicki - 2015 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 40 (1):179-217.
A Paradox of Matter and Form.Maegan Fairchild - 2017 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):33-42.


Added to PP index

Total views
40 ( #285,771 of 2,519,866 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #50,478 of 2,519,866 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes