The End of the Teapot Argument for Atheism (and All Its Tawdry Imitators)

Abstract

Atheists sometimes use Bertrand Russell's teapot argument, and its variants with other objects in place of the teapot, to argue for the rationality of atheism. In this paper I show that this use of the teapot argument and its variants is unacceptably circular. The circularity arises because there is indirect evidence against the objects invoked in the arguments.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Naturalistic Ethics and the Argument from Evil.Mark T. Nelson - 1991 - Faith and Philosophy 8 (3):368-379.
A Note from inside the Teapot.Anthony Grafton - 2004 - Teaching New Histories of Philosophy:317-328.
On the PROVER9 Ontological Argument.T. Parent - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (2):475-483.
Anselmian atheism.Stephen Maitzen - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):225–239.
The Nihilistic Consequences of the Argument from Evil.Robert Lehe - 2009 - International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):427-437.
Reasonable atheism: a moral case for respectful disbelief.Scott F. Aikin - 2011 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Edited by Robert B. Talisse.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-13

Downloads
2,793 (#2,577)

6 months
816 (#1,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations