The demarcation problem in the history of science, or what historical epistemology has to say about cultural identification

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):52-66 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses mechanisms of demarcation in science, as a case of establishing identity – one of the topical problems of contemporary cultural studies. Evidently, the quality of cultural interaction depends on the status of the other in relation to one’s identity. Contemporary cultural studies distinguish two types of this interaction: exclusion, i.e. suppression of the other as a condi­tion for the formation of one’s identity; and inclusion, a retrieval of the excluded, leading to the transformation of one’s identity. This article claims that the historical epistemology, as a special ap­proach to the history of science, has elaborated a number of strat­egies regulating the relationship of science and non-science in the form of an attitude of present science towards its past. The article examines four of these strategies – three of them construct the identity of science through establishing boundaries and by exclud­ing the other; the fourth presupposes acknowledging the other and endowing it with actuality. The last strategy demonstrates the dialogue between science and its other in action and, more importantly, identifies the necessary condition for the successful interaction – the destruction of a homogeneous scientific identity and allowance of self-identification to continue with­out end. Consequently, study­ing the types of interaction between scientific and non-scientific views in the field of historical epistemology allows one to conceptualize the gen­eral procedure of establishing cultural identification.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Problems and Specifics of Philosophy of History.В.С Кржевов - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):37-45.
Should we conceive science outside the history?Olga Stoliarova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):47-51.
The crisis of representations.Lada Shipovalova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):171-187.
Why so complicated?Tatiana Sokolova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):47-51.
Is There a Cultural Barrier Between Historical Epistemology and Analytic Philosophy of Science?Anastasios Brenner - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (2):201-214.
Genetic Epistemology, a Universalist Approach to the History of Science.Mark A. Winstanley - 2016 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 10 (2):249-278.
Genetic Epistemology, a Universalist Approach to the History of Science.Mark A. Winstanley - 2016 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 10 (2):249-278.
Genetic Epistemology, a Universalist Approach to the History of Science.Mark A. Winstanley - forthcoming - New Content is Available for Journal of the Philosophy of History.
The crisis of representations.Lada Shipovalova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):171-187.
MiIlieu, Embodiment, and Cultural Studies of Science.Olga Stoliarova - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):78-83.
On the Search of Mechanisms of Scientific Knowledge Evolution.Elena A. Mamchur - 2015 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 46 (4):145-162.
The Social Ingredients in All Ways of Acquiring Reliable Knowledge.Rom Harré - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):67-77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-16

Downloads
10 (#1,129,009)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Lada Shipovalova
St. Petersburg University
Yulia Shaposhnikova
Saint Petersburg State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references