Structures and Logics: A Case for (a) Relativism

Erkenntnis 79 (S2):309-329 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I use the cases of intuitionistic arithmetic with Church’s thesis, intuitionistic analysis, and smooth infinitesimal analysis to argue for a sort of pluralism or relativism about logic. The thesis is that logic is relative to a structure. There are classical structures, intuitionistic structures, and (possibly) paraconsistent structures. Each such structure is a legitimate branch of mathematics, and there does not seem to be an interesting logic that is common to all of them. One main theme of my ante rem structuralism is that any coherent axiomatization describes a structure, or a class of structures. If one weakens the logic, then more axiomatizations become coherent

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Structure and identity.Stewart Shapiro - 2006 - In Fraser MacBride (ed.), Identity and Modality. Oxford University Press. pp. 34--69.
Implicational f-structures and implicational relevance logics.A. Avron - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):788-802.
A universal logic approach to adaptive logics.Diderik Batens - 2007 - Logica Universalis 1 (1):221-242.
Structured propositions and sentence structure.Jeffrey King - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (5):495 - 521.
A rational reconstruction of the domain of feature structures.M. Andrew Moshier - 1995 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (2):111-143.
Structure in mathematics.Saunders Lane - 1996 - Philosophia Mathematica 4 (2):174-183.
Quasi-Truth, Supervaluations and Free Logic.Newton C. A. Da Costa & Otavio Bueno - 1999 - History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (3-4):215-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-27

Downloads
141 (#128,555)

6 months
12 (#200,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stewart Shapiro
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

Why logical pluralism?Colin R. Caret - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 20):4947-4968.
Mathematical platonism meets ontological pluralism?Matteo Plebani - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-19.
Mathematical platonism meets ontological pluralism?Matteo Plebani - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (6):655-673.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The logical basis of metaphysics.Michael Dummett - 1991 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Philosophy of logic.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1970 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Edited by Simon Blackburn & Keith Simmons.
In contradiction: a study of the transconsistent.Graham Priest - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Saving truth from paradox.Hartry H. Field - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Logical Pluralism.Jc Beall & Greg Restall - 2005 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Edited by Greg Restall.

View all 42 references / Add more references