Suicide and “do not resuscitate”: An ethical dilemma

Clinical Ethics 16 (2):160-162 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Advance directives allow people to accept or decline medical interventions and to appoint surrogate decision makers if they become incapacitated. Living wills are written in ambiguous terms and require interpretation by clinical providers. Living wills cannot cover all conceivable end-of-life decisions. There is too much variability in clinical decision making to make an all-encompassing living will possible. While there are many limitations of advance directives, this article reviews some of the most troublesome ethical dilemmas with regard to advance directives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dying Tax Free: The Modern Advance Directive.Timothy Kirk & George R. Luck - 2010 - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 3 (39):605-609.
Caring for decisionally incapacitated elderly.Dallas M. High - 1989 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (1).
A direct advance on advance directives.David Shaw - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (5):267-274.
Living wills and substituted judgments: A critical analysis.Jos V. M. Welie - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):169-183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-14

Downloads
19 (#758,603)

6 months
7 (#364,455)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references