Outsourcing Ethical Obligations: Should the Revised Common Rule Address the Responsibilities of Investigators and Sponsors?

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):397-410 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Common Rule creates a division of moral labor in research. It implies that investigators and sponsors can outsource their ethical obligations to IRBs and participants, thereby fostering a culture of compliance, rather than one of responsibility. The proposed revisions to the Common Rule are likely to exacerbate this problem. To harness the expressive power of the law, I propose the Common Rule be revised to include the ethical responsibilities of investigators and sponsors

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,408

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The moral responsibilities of stockholders.Richard J. Klonoski - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (5):385 - 390.
New Rules for Research with Human Participants?Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.
Rule Consequentialism and the Problem of Partial Acceptance.Kevin Tobia - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):643-652.
Conflict of interest and medical publication.Marcus M. Reidenberg - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):455-457.
What the ANPRM Missed: Additional Needs for IRB Reform.Charles W. Lidz & Suzanne Garverich - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):390-396.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-27

Downloads
30 (#452,445)

6 months
2 (#640,495)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?