Mendel on Developmental Information

In Chris Meyns (ed.), Information and the History of Philosophy. London: Routledge. pp. 262-280 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has been widely received that one of Gregor Mendel’s most important contributions to the history of genetics is his novel work on developmental information (for example, the proposal of the famous Mendelian ratios like 1:2:1, 3:1, and 9:3:3:1). This view is well evidenced by the fact that much of early Mendelians’ work in the 1900s focuses on the retrodiction (viz. the re-analysis of the pre-exist data with Mendel’s approach). However, there is no consensus on what Mendel meant by development (Entwicklung). Nor is there an agreement on the interpretation of Mendel’s laws of developmental series (Entwicklungsreihe). This chapter revisits Mendel’s notions of development and developmental series. Firstly, I argue that Mendel’s use of development is greatly influenced by Gärtner’s. Secondly, I show Mendel’s work on developmental series are novel and important for its new ways of experimentation, conceputalisation, and analysis. Thirdly, I argue that Mendel’s laws of developmental information were not about heredity.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science studies and Mendel's paradigm.Vítězslav Orel - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (2):pp. 226-241.
What would have happened if Darwin had known Mendel (or Mendel's work)?Pablo Lorenzano - 2011 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (1):3-48.
The real objective of Mendel's paper.Floyd V. Monaghan & Alain F. Corcos - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (3):267-292.
Mendel No Mendelian?Robert Cecil Olby - 1979 - History of Science 17 (1):53-72.
A Conceptual Ambiguity that Contributed to the Neglect of Mendel's Paper.Iris Sandler & Laurence Sandler - 1985 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 7 (1):3 - 70.
Mendel’s use of mathematical modelling: ratios, predictions and the appeal to tradition.Amir Teicher - 2014 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 36 (2):187-208.
History of Plant Hybridization According to Mendel's Contemporary Rudolf Geschwind.Vítězslav Orel - 1986 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 8 (2):251 - 263.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-26

Downloads
265 (#72,669)

6 months
114 (#30,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Yafeng Shan
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

References found in this work

What Genes Can't Do.Lenny Moss - 2003 - MIT Press.
What Genes Can’t Do.Lenny Moss - 2003 - Journal of the History of Biology 38 (2):383-384.
Mendel No Mendelian?Robert Cecil Olby - 1979 - History of Science 17 (1):53-72.

View all 16 references / Add more references