Let's Move Beyond Critique—But Please, Let's Not Depoliticize the Debate

American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):20-22 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2017.1409836

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Why is there a stem cell debate? And how to depoliticize it.Christopher A. Pynes - 2007 - In Mohan Matthen & Christopher Stephens (eds.), Philosophy of Biology. Elsevier. pp. 144--425.
The Moral Argument For The Non-Existence Of God.Thomas Krettek - 1997 - Philosophy and Theology 10 (2):329-352.
Measuring, Disrupting, Emancipating: Three Pictures of Critique.Frieder Vogelmann - 2017 - Constellations 24 (1):101-112.
A Communitarian Critique of Liberalism.Daniel A. Bell - 2005 - Analyse & Kritik 27 (2):215-238.
Conformism and Critique in Liberal Society.Frieda Heyting & Christopher Winch (eds.) - 2005 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Self-Tracking for Health and the Quantified Self: Re-Articulating Autonomy, Solidarity, and Authenticity in an Age of Personalized Healthcare.Tamar Sharon - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (1):93-121.
On the Use of Language in the Anti-Capitalist Debate.Eve Poole - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 59 (4):319-325.
Critique is a thing of this world: Towards a genealogy of critique.Tom Boland - 2014 - History of the Human Sciences 27 (1):108-123.
The british national health service: Lessons from the "socialist calculation debate".John Meadowcroft - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (3):307 – 326.
Scientific Realism and the 'Pessimistic Induction'.Stathis Psillos - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (5):S306-S314.
Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, C. A. J. Coady, Alberto Giubilini, and Sagar Sanyal (eds.), The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate, Oxford University Press, 2016, 269pp. [REVIEW]Stephen M. Campbell & Sven Nyholm - 2017 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2017.
Bringing in the controversy: re-politicizing the de-politicized strategy of ethics committees.Malin Ideland, Tora Holmberg & Lonneke Poort - 2013 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 9 (1):1-13.
Preparing to move and deciding not to move☆.Gilberto Gomes - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):457-459.
Practical Reasons: The problem of gridlock.Ruth Chang - 2013 - In Barry Dainton & Howard Robinson (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Analytic Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 474-499.
Divine Passibility: God and Emotion.Anastasia Scrutton - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (9):866-874.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-04

Downloads
16 (#886,588)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tamar Sharon
Radboud University Nijmegen

Citations of this work

I, My Love, and Apps.Craig Klugman - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):1-2.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Quantified Relationship.John Danaher, Sven Nyholm & Brian D. Earp - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (2):3-19.
Identifying the normative challenges posed by technology’s ‘soft’ impacts.Tsjalling Swierstra - 2015 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):5-20.

Add more references