Life and consciousness – The Vedāntic view

Communicative and Integrative Biology 8 (5):e1085138 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the past, philosophers, scientists, and even the general opinion, had no problem in accepting the existence of consciousness in the same way as the existence of the physical world. After the advent of Newtonian mechanics, science embraced a complete materialistic conception about reality. Scientists started proposing hypotheses like abiogenesis (origin of first life from accumulation of atoms and molecules) and the Big Bang theory (the explosion theory for explaining the origin of universe). How the universe came to be what it is now is a key philosophical question. The hypothesis that it came from Nothing (as proposed by Stephen Hawking, among others), proves to be dissembling, since the quantum vacuum can hardly be considered a void. In modern science, it is generally assumed that matter existed before the universe came to be. Modern science hypothesizes that the manifestation of life on Earth is nothing but a mere increment in the complexity of matter — and hence is an outcome of evolution of matter (chemical evolution) following the Big Bang. After the manifestation of life, modern science believed that chemical evolution transformed itself into biological evolution, which then had caused the entire biodiversity on our planet. The ontological view of the organism as a complex machine presumes life as just a chance occurrence, without any inner purpose. This approach in science leaves no room for the subjective aspect of consciousness in its attempt to know the world as the relationships among forces, atoms, and molecules. On the other hand, the Vedāntic view states that the origin of everything material and nonmaterial is sentient and absolute (unconditioned). Thus, sentient life is primitive and reproductive of itself – omne vivum ex vivo – life comes from life. This is the scientifically verified law of experience. Life is essentially cognitive and conscious. And, consciousness, which is fundamental, manifests itself in the gradational forms of all sentient and insentient nature. In contrast to the idea of objective evolution of bodies, as envisioned by Darwin and followers, Vedānta advocates the idea of subjective evolution of consciousness as the developing principle of the world. In this paper, an attempt has been made to highlight a few relevant developments supporting a sentient view of life in scientific research, which has caused a paradigm shift in our understanding of life and its origin.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Indian Cosmology.Krishna Prakash Tripathi - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 44:73-78.
Sorry, Darwin: Chemistry Never Made the Transition to Biology.Bhakti Niskama Shanta - 2011 - Science and Scientist (scienceandscientist.org/biology) and Darwin Under Siege (scienceandscientist.org/Darwin).
Life and mind.Margaret A. Boden - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (4):453-463.
The three eras of cosmic evolution.Eric Chaisson - 1987 - World Futures 23 (1):11-29.
Intended and Unintended Life.Brooke Alan Trisel - 2012 - Philosophical Forum 43 (4):395-403.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-17

Downloads
570 (#29,768)

6 months
85 (#48,211)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ph. D. Shanta, Ph.D.
Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute Of Spiritual Culture And Science

References found in this work

Minds, brains, and programs.John Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
The emperor’s new mind.Roger Penrose - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
Computing machinery and intelligence.Alan M. Turing - 1950 - Mind 59 (October):433-60.
Order out of chaos: man's new dialogue with nature.I. Prigogine - 1984 - Boulder, CO: Random House. Edited by Isabelle Stengers & I. Prigogine.
Is consciousness a brain process.Ullin T. Place - 1956 - British Journal of Psychology 47 (1):44-50.

View all 12 references / Add more references