Iv. understanding Peter Winch

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):119 – 122 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Peter Winch's The Idea of a Social Science has been the subject of repeated misunderstanding. This discussion takes one recent example and shows how Winch's argument is gravely distorted. What is at issue is not, as is usually supposed, whether we can accept or endorse another society's explanations of its activities, but whether we have to look for an explanatory connection between concepts and action. Winch's argument is that before we can try to explain actions, we have to identify them correctly. This can only be done by seeing how they, and the concepts they are associated with, fit within a way of life. Grasping its rule?following character is understanding action. Once the difficulties in making such identifications are appreciated, we will be less inclined to accept facile explanations why people in other societies do the things they do

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Studies in the philosophy of Wittgenstein.Peter Winch (ed.) - 1969 - New York,: Humanities P..
Knowledge and society.Arnold Levison - 1966 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 9 (1-4):132 – 146.
Winch’s double-edged idea of a social science.Philip Pettit - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (1):63-77.
Winch and Anscombe on Ethics and Religion.Howard Mounce - 2011 - Philosophical Investigations 34 (3):241-248.
Understanding a Primitive Society.Berel Dov Lerner - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (3):303-309.
Winch on moral dilemmas and moral modality.Craig Taylor - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):148 – 157.
Winch Reassessed.John G. Gunnell - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4):616-622.
Winch and instrumental pluralism.Berel Dov Lerner - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (2):180-191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-05

Downloads
37 (#392,508)

6 months
2 (#889,309)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Wesley Sharrock
University of Manchester

References found in this work

Hermeneutics, transcendental philosophy and social science.Mark B. Okrent - 1984 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 27 (1-4):23 – 49.

Add more references