In defence of ageism

Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (3):188-194 (1994)


Health care should be preferentially allocated to younger patients. This is just and is seen as just. Age is an objective factor in rationing decisions. The arguments against 'ageism' are answered. The effects of age on current methods of rationing are illustrated, and the practical applications of an age-related criterion are discussed. Ageist policies are in current use and open discussion of them is advocated.

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,805

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

16 (#671,952)

6 months
1 (#386,031)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Rationing: The Loss of a Concept.H. Upton - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (7):406-409.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

In Defence of Ageism.A. B. Shaw - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (2):117-118.
In Defence of Ageism.M. M. Rivlin - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (4):270-271.
Ageism in Science: Fair-Play Between Generations.Johannes J. F. Schroots - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):445-451.
Ageism and Equality.John Harris & Sadie Regmi - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (5):263-266.
Ageism and the Deployments of “Age”. A Constructionist View.Christopher L. Bodily - 1994 - In Theodore R. Sarbin & John I. Kitsuse (eds.), Constructing the Social. Sage Publications. pp. 174--94.
The Role of Reasonableness in Self-Defence.Dr Hamish Stewart - 2003 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 16 (2):317-336.
Contagious Disease and Self-Defence.T. M. Wilkinson - 2007 - Res Publica 13 (4):339-359.
Advertising and Older Consumers: Image and Ageism.Marylyn Carrigan & Isabelle Szmigin - 2000 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 9 (1):42–50.