Environmental conflict and the legacy of the Reformation

Environmental Politics 29 (6):1042-1062 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Liberal political theory seeks to enable diverse groups to coexist respectfully despite their differences. According to liberals, this requires embracing certain political institutions and refraining from imposing controversial views on others. The liberal formula has enjoyed considerable success. However, green political theorists insist liberal societies will precipitate an ecological crisis unless they are transformed in line with (controversial) green views. These perspectives highlight a longstanding gap in liberal theory. Liberalism rose to prominence only after Reformation-era Christians accepted that societal success did not require the ascendancy of any particular doctrine. Liberals never had to show how their recommendations could be reconciled with the once-common view that toleration would be catastrophic. Yet today’s greens once again anticipate catastrophe unless they can remake civilization around their doctrines. Liberals must find a way to respond to these concerns if they are to sustain their paradigm amidst environmental conflicts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Jonathan Quong’s Sectarian Political Liberalism.Kevin Vallier - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (1):175-194.
Self-defeat and the foundations of public reason.Sameer Bajaj - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (12):3133-3151.
The Ethics of Reasoning from Conjecture.Micah Schwartzman - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):521-544.
Public reason as a category of public policy areas.A. Tretyak - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (22):227-231.
In Defence of Intelligible Reasons in Public Justification.Kevin Vallier - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (264):596-616.
Deliberative Toleration.James Bohman - 2003 - Political Theory 31 (6):757-779.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-16

Downloads
23 (#664,515)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dan C. Shahar
West Virginia University

Citations of this work

Public justification.Kevin Vallier - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Public justification.Fred D'Agostino - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references