Do the facts speak for themselves? Partisan disagreement as a challenge to democratic competence

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 20 (1-2):115-139 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The partisan and ideological polarization of American politics since the 1970s appears to have affected pubic opinion in striking ways. The American public has become increasingly partisan and ideological along liberal-conservative lines on a wide range of issues, including even foreign policy. This has raised questions about how rational the public is, in the broad sense of the public's responsiveness to objective conditions. Widespread partisan disagreements over what those conditions arei.e., disagreements about the factssuggest that large proportions of the public may be perceiving the facts incorrectly. The facts in question are important enough that these partisan disagreements may translate into sub-optimal policy preferences and electoral decisions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ideal Fan or Good Fans?J. S. Russell - 2012 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (1):16-30.
Professors and their politics: The policy views of social scientists.Daniel B. Klein & Charlotta Stern - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (3-4):257-303.
Moderate Partisanship as Oscillation.Stephen Mumford - 2012 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (3):369-375.
Disagreement: Ethics and Elsewhere.Folke Tersman - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S1):55-72.
Morality and emergency.Tom Sorell - 2003 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (1):21–37.
Moral disagreement and moral expertise.Sarah McGrath - 2008 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume 3. Oxford University Press. pp. 87-108.
Limits of Elite Influence on Public Opinion.Stanley Feldman, Leonie Huddy & George E. Marcus - 2012 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 24 (4):489-503.
Can a Partisan Be a Moralist?Paul Gomberg - 1990 - American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (1):71 - 79.
The Problem of Deep Disagreement.Klemens Kappel - 2012 - Discipline Filosofiche 22 (2):7-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
40 (#389,966)

6 months
12 (#202,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Irrelevance of Economic Theory to Understanding Economic Ignorance.Stephen Earl Bennett & Jeffrey Friedman - 2008 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 20 (3):195-258.
Can Deliberative Democracy Be Partisan?Russell Muirhead - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2-3):129-157.
Can Deliberative Democracy Be Partisan?Russell Muirhead - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2):129-157.
Sources of mass political disagreement: Rejoinder to Marietta.Michael H. Murakami - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2-3):331-354.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964).Philip E. Converse - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):1-74.
The Phantom Public.Walter Lippmann - 1925 - Transaction Publishers.
Public Opinion.Charles E. Merriam - 1946 - Philosophical Review 55:497.

View all 22 references / Add more references