Biology intersects religion and morality

Biology and Philosophy 7 (1):77-88 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Michael Ruse's writings explore what sociobiology says about morality. Further, he claims that sociobiology undermines the base for Christian morality. After responding to criticisms of Ruse, especially those of Arthur Peacocke, I lay a base for meeting his challenge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
64 (#242,723)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin Sharpe
St. Cloud State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral Philosophy as Applied Science.Michael Ruse & Edward O. Wilson - 1994 - In E. Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. The Mit Press. Bradford Books. pp. 61--421.
Issues in Science and Religion.Ian G. Barbour - 1967 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (3):259-261.

View all 10 references / Add more references